UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser

UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser
File photo of Israel's F-35 Lightning II fighter (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 30 August 2024
Follow

UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser

UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser
  • ‘Special relationship’ could suffer ‘serious rift,’ endanger Britain’s role in F-35 program: Robert O’Brien
  • UK must ‘take every step necessary’ to shut down ICC investigation into Israeli PM, defense minister

London: The UK risks damaging its relationship with Washington over a potential ban on weapons sales to Israel, a senior adviser to Donald Trump has warned.

The former US president’s last national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, said an arms ban on Israel by the UK government would also endanger Britain’s role in the F-35 jet program, The Guardian reported.

O’Brien, who is now a key voice on national security in the Trump election campaign, made the remarks at an event hosted by the Policy Exchange think tank.

He also urged the UK to avoid damaging the “special relationship” with the US by “taking every step necessary” to shut down the International Criminal Court investigation into Israel’s leadership.

The F-35 is the result of a multinational program that includes the UK as a partner and Israel as a sales customer.

Parts of the jet are produced by British arms companies, and Israel has used the aircraft in its devastation of Gaza.

The UK government is deciding whether to suspend arms export licenses to Israel over fears that British systems may have been used by the Israel Defense Forces to breach international humanitarian law.

“There is a potential there for a serious rift, whether it is a Harris or Trump administration, between the UK and the US, and I would tread very carefully,” O’Brien said.

“The F-35 is a joint project and it is going to continue to go to Israel no matter what Turkiye, the UK or any other country has to do with it.

“You would hate to see a situation where the UK is no longer a partner in the F-35 project or other advanced platforms because of a very ill-advised arms embargo on Israel.

“The consequences of an arms embargo on Israel is something the UK really needs to think about at a time when Russia and China are posing a massive threat to the West. A lot of high-tech on which the UK relies comes directly or indirectly via Israel.”

O’Brien also attacked Britain’s stance on the ICC probe, which he accused of being highly selective.

Under former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, the UK objected to the court’s issuing of arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

But under the current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the objections were dropped in late July.

O’Brien accused the court of being “an impediment to peace in the region,” adding: “For the ICC to go after Israeli leaders is a joke … the UK should take every step necessary to shut it down.”

If the UK moves ahead with an arms embargo on Israel, British firms may face difficulty in selling products in the US, O’Brien said.

Washington would “certainly” launch congressional action instituting a counter-embargo on major UK weapons firms, including BAE Systems, he added.

“It (the arms embargo) is an extraordinarily dangerous policy proposal and has the potential to tear open the special relationship and really hurt the Western alliance and NATO.”


Taliban in control of 39 Afghan embassies globally

Taliban in control of 39 Afghan embassies globally
Updated 23 sec ago
Follow

Taliban in control of 39 Afghan embassies globally

Taliban in control of 39 Afghan embassies globally
  • No international government has formally recognized Taliban administration three years after they seized power
  • Many countries, especially Western nations, have urged Taliban to ease restrictions on women for recognition 

The Taliban administration is in control of 39 Afghan embassies and consulates globally three years after it took over Afghanistan and the previous Western-backed government collapsed, the acting foreign ministry said on Thursday.

No international government has formally recognized the Taliban administration, though China and the United Arab Emirates have officially accepted its ambassadors in their capitals.

Many governments, especially Western nations including the United States, have said the path to any formal recognition of the Taliban will be stuck until they change course on women’s rights and re-open high schools and universities to girls and women and allow their full freedom of movement.

The Taliban say they respect rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and that restrictions on its banking sector and a lack of recognition are hindering its economy.

After the collapse of Afghanistan’s republic government in 2021, foreign embassies were thrown into disarray with many issuing documents such as visas and passports that in some cases the Taliban have said should not be recognized.

The Taliban has appointed its own diplomats to head several embassies, including ambassadors accepted in Abu Dhabi and Beijing and a charge d’affaires in neighboring Pakistan. At some missions, diplomats appointed under the previous government work with Taliban authorities.

“Thirty-nine embassies and diplomatic affairs obey the central authority, namely the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” said the Taliban’s acting foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi at a press conference in Kabul.

He added that his ministry had sent dozens of diplomats to 11 countries in the past year, including Turkiye, Russia, Iran and Pakistan.

Muttaqi said Afghanistan would send a new ambassador to Uzbekistan this week and expected Russia to remove the Taliban from its list of terrorist organizations “soon.”

In July, the Taliban said it was cutting ties with at least 14 Afghan diplomatic missions, adding it would not honor passports and visas issued by those embassies, mostly based in Europe. 

Fatimah Amjad

Editors Pakistan


OnlinePK

Taliban in control of 39 Afghan embassies globally

REUTERS

The Taliban administration is in control of 39 Afghan embassies and consulates globally three years after it took over Afghanistan and the previous Western-backed government collapsed, the acting foreign ministry said on Thursday.

No international government has formally recognized the Taliban administration, though China and the United Arab Emirates have officially accepted its ambassadors in their capitals.

Many governments, especially Western nations including the United States, have said the path to any formal recognition of the Taliban will be stuck until they change course on women’s rights and re-open high schools and universities to girls and women and allow their full freedom of movement.

The Taliban say they respect rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and that restrictions on its banking sector and a lack of recognition are hindering its economy.

After the collapse of Afghanistan’s republic government in 2021, foreign embassies were thrown into disarray with many issuing documents such as visas and passports that in some cases the Taliban have said should not be recognized.

The Taliban has appointed its own diplomats to head several embassies, including ambassadors accepted in Abu Dhabi and Beijing and a charge d’affaires in neighboring Pakistan. At some missions, diplomats appointed under the previous government work with Taliban authorities.

“Thirty-nine embassies and diplomatic affairs obey the central authority, namely the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” said the Taliban’s acting foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi at a press conference in Kabul.

He added that his ministry had sent dozens of diplomats to 11 countries in the past year, including Turkiye, Russia, Iran and Pakistan.

Muttaqi said Afghanistan would send a new ambassador to Uzbekistan this week and expected Russia to remove the Taliban from its list of terrorist organizations “soon.”

In July, the Taliban said it was cutting ties with at least 14 Afghan diplomatic missions, adding it would not honor passports and visas issued by those embassies, mostly based in Europe. 


Jihadist attacks in Mali capital killed more than 70: security sources

Jihadist attacks in Mali capital killed more than 70: security sources
Updated 24 min 1 sec ago
Follow

Jihadist attacks in Mali capital killed more than 70: security sources

Jihadist attacks in Mali capital killed more than 70: security sources
  • Security source speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 77 people had been killed and 255 wounded
Bamako: A jihadist attack in the Malian capital targeting a military police training camp and a military airport left more than 70 dead and 200 wounded, security sources said Thursday.
A security source speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 77 people had been killed and 255 wounded in Tuesday’s attacks in Bamako.
An authenticated confidential official document put the toll at around 100, naming 81 victims.
Thursday’s edition of Le Soir daily reported that the funerals of around 50 military police students would take place on the same day.
Mali’s military-led authorities have so far not released a precise death toll from the attacks, claimed by Al-Qaeda-linked jihadist group JNIM.
The operation was the first of its kind in years and dealt a forceful blow to the ruling junta, experts say.
The Malian capital is normally spared the sort of attacks that occur almost daily in some parts of the West African country.
The general staff admitted late Tuesday that “some human lives were lost,” notably personnel at the military police center.
JNIM claimed that a few dozen of its fighters had killed and wounded “hundreds” from the opposing ranks, including members of the Russian paramilitary group Wagner.
The attack came a day after junta-led Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso marked a year since the creation of their breakaway grouping, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).
The trio have been under military rule following a string of coups since 2020, and in January said they were breaking ties with regional bloc ECOWAS.

Muslim Americans moving to Jill Stein in potential blow to Kamala Harris

Muslim Americans moving to Jill Stein in potential blow to Kamala Harris
Updated 19 September 2024
Follow

Muslim Americans moving to Jill Stein in potential blow to Kamala Harris

Muslim Americans moving to Jill Stein in potential blow to Kamala Harris
  • 40 percent of Muslims back Stein in Michigan, 12 percent back Harris
  • Muslim voters may prove crucial in close White House race

WASHINGTON: Arab-American and Muslim voters angry at US support for Israel’s offensive in Gaza are shunning Democrat Kamala Harris in the presidential race to back third-party candidate Jill Stein in numbers that could deny Harris victories in battleground states that will decide the Nov. 5 election.
A Council on American-Islamic Relations poll released this month showed that in Michigan, home to a large Arab American community, 40 percent of Muslim voters backed the Green Party’s Stein. Republican candidate Donald Trump got 18 percent with Harris, who is President Joe Biden’s vice president, trailing at 12 percent.
Stein also leads Harris among Muslims in Arizona and Wisconsin, battleground states with sizable Muslim populations where Biden defeated Trump in 2020 by slim margins.
Harris was the leading pick of Muslim voters in Georgia and Pennsylvania, while Trump prevailed in Nevada with 27 percent, just ahead of Harris’ 26 percent, according to the CAIR poll of 1,155 Muslim voters nationwide. All are battleground states that have swung on narrow margins in recent elections.
Biden won the 2020 Muslim vote, credited in some exit polls with more than 80 percent of their support, but Muslim backing of Democrats has fallen sharply since Israel’s nearly year-long action in Gaza.
About 3.5 million Americans reported being of Middle Eastern descent in the 2020 US Census, the first year such data was recorded. Although they make up about 1 percent of the total US population of 335 million, their voters may prove crucial in a race that opinion polls show to be close.
On Tuesday, Harris called for an end to the Israel-Gaza war and the return of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. She also said Israel must not reoccupy the Palestinian enclave and backed a two-state solution.
But at closed-door meetings in Michigan and elsewhere, Harris campaign officials have rebuffed appeals to halt or limit US arms shipments to Israel, community leaders say.
“Decades of community organizing and civic engagement and mobilizing have not manifested into any benefit,” said Faye Nemer, founder of the Michigan-based MENA American Chamber of Commerce to promote US trade with the Middle East.
“We’re part of the fabric of this country, but our concerns are not taken into consideration,” she said.
Stein is aggressively campaigning on Gaza, while Trump representatives are meeting with Muslim groups and promising a swifter peace than Harris can deliver.
The Harris campaign declined to comment on the shifting dynamics; officials tasked with Muslim outreach were not available for interviews.
Stein’s 2016 run ended with just over 1 percent of the popular vote, but some Democrats blamed her and the Green Party for taking votes away from Democrat Hillary Clinton. Pollsters give Stein no chance of winning in 2024.
But her support for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, for an immediate US arms embargo on Israel and for student movements to force universities to divest from weapons investments have made her a star in pro-Palestinian circles. Her running mate Butch Ware, a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, is Muslim.
This month Stein spoke at ArabCon in Dearborn, Michigan, an annual gathering of Arab Americans and was featured on the cover of The Arab American News under the headline “The Choice 2024.” Last week in an interview with The Breakfast Club, a New York radio program, she said, “Every vote cast for our campaign is a vote against genocide,” a charge that Israel denies.

Trump team campaigns for Arab American votes
At the same time, the Trump team has hosted dozens of in-person and virtual events with Arab Americans and Muslims in Michigan and Arizona, said Richard Grenell, Trump’s former acting Director of National Intelligence.
“Arab American leaders in Detroit know this is their moment to send a powerful message to the Democrat party that they shouldn’t be taken for granted,” Grenell said. Trump has said he would secure more Arab-Israeli peace deals.
The Trump outreach and Stein’s appeal could translate into numbers that might threaten Harris. The Green Party is on most state ballots, including all battleground states that could decide the election, except for Georgia and Nevada, where the party is suing to be included.
Biden defeated Trump in 2020 by just thousands of votes in some states, thanks in part to the support of Arab and Muslim voters in states where they are concentrated, including Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Biden won Michigan by 154,000 votes in 2020, but Trump defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton there by fewer than 11,000 votes in 2016. The state is home to overlapping groups of more than 200,000 registered voters who are Muslim and 300,000 who report ancestry from the Middle East and North Africa.
In Philadelphia, which has a large Black Muslim population, activists have joined a national “Abandon Harris” campaign. They helped organize protests during her debate with Trump last week.
Philadelphia CAIR co-chair Rabiul Chowdhury said, “We have options. If Trump pledges to end the war and bring home all hostages, it’s game over for Harris.” Trump has said the war would never have erupted if he were president. It’s unclear how he would end it. Trump is a firm supporter of Israel.
In Georgia, where Biden won in 2020 by 11,779 votes, activists are rallying 12,000 voters to commit to withhold votes from Harris unless the Biden administration acts by Oct. 10 to halt all arms shipments to Israel, demands a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and the West Bank, and pledges to uphold a US law that imposes an arms embargo on nations engaged in war crimes.
Thousands have already signed similar pledges in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
US Representative Dan Kildee, a Michigan Democrat, said he worries about the impact the Gaza war will have in November. He said not only Arab Americans and Muslims, but a much broader group of younger voters and others are also upset.
“You can’t unring a bell,” he said, adding Harris still had “the space and grace” to shift gears, but time was running out.


Germany has stopped approving war weapons exports to Israel, source says

Germany has stopped approving war weapons exports to Israel, source says
Updated 19 September 2024
Follow

Germany has stopped approving war weapons exports to Israel, source says

Germany has stopped approving war weapons exports to Israel, source says
  • Germany’s arms exports to Israel slow sharply in 2024
  • Legal challenges argue German arms exports breach humanitarian law

BERLIN: Germany has put a hold on new exports of weapons of war to Israel while it deals with legal challenges, according to a Reuters analysis of data and a source close to the Economy Ministry.
A source close to the ministry cited a senior government official as saying it had stopped work on approving export licenses for arms to Israel due to legal and political pressure from legal cases arguing that such exports from Germany breached humanitarian law.
The Economy Ministry said on Thursday there was no ban on arms exports to Israel and there would not be one, with decisions made case-by-case after careful review, adding that international law, foreign and security policy were key factors in their assessments.
“There is no German arms export boycott against Israel,” a spokesperson for government said on Wednesday, commenting on the report.
Last year, Germany approved arms exports to Israel worth 326.5 million euros ($363.5 million), including military equipment and war weapons, a 10-fold increase from 2022, according to data from the Economy Ministry, which approves export licenses.
However approvals have dropped this year, with only 14.5 million euros’ worth granted from January to Aug. 21, according to data provided by the Economy Ministry in response to a parliamentary question.
Of this, the weapons of war category accounted for only 32,449 euros.
In its defense of two cases, one before the International Court of Justice and one in Berlin brought by the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, the government has said no weapons of war have been exported under any license issued since the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel, apart from spares for long-term contracts, the source added.
Israel’s assault on Gaza has killed more than 41,000 Palestinians since Oct. 7, according to the local Hamas-controlled health ministry. It has also displaced most of the population of 2.3 million, caused a hunger crisis and led to genocide allegations at the World Court, which Israel denies. No case challenging German arms exports to Israel has yet succeeded, including a case brought by Nicaragua at the ICJ.

Disagreement on arms exports in German goverment
But the issue has created friction within the government as the Chancellery maintains its support for Israel while the Greens-led economy and foreign ministries, sensitive to criticism from party members, have increasingly criticized the Netanyahu administration.
Legal challenges across Europe have also led other allies of Israel to pause or suspend arms exports.
Britain this month suspended 30 out of 350 licenses for arms exports to Israel due to concerns that Israel could be violating international humanitarian law.
In February, a Dutch court ordered the Netherlands to halt all exports of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel over concerns about their use in attacks on civilian targets in Gaza. President Joe Biden’s administration this year paused — but then resumed — shipments of some bombs to Israel after US concerns about their use in densely populated Gaza.
Approvals and shipments of other types of weapons, in more precise systems, continued as US officials maintained that Israel needed the capacity to defend itself.
Alexander Schwarz, a lawyer at the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, which has filed five lawsuits against Berlin, suggested that the significant decline in approvals for 2024 indicated a genuine, though possibly temporary, reluctance to supply weapons to Israel.
“However, I would not interpret this as a conscious change in policy,” Schwarz added.


Late Harrods owner Al-Fayed accused of rape: BBC

Late Harrods owner Al-Fayed accused of rape: BBC
Updated 19 September 2024
Follow

Late Harrods owner Al-Fayed accused of rape: BBC

Late Harrods owner Al-Fayed accused of rape: BBC
  • More than 20 women have spoken to the BBC as part of a special investigation alleging assault and physical violence at properties in London and Paris

London: Multiple women have accused Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, the former owner of upmarket London department store Harrods where they worked, of rape and sexual assault, the BBC said on Thursday.
The allegations, made in a BBC documentary and podcast, are the latest to be levelled at powerful figures following the start of the #MeToo movement in 2017.
Fayed, who died last year at the age of 94, was a prominent figure in British life for decades due to his ownership of Harrods.
A confidant of the late Princess Diana, his son Dodi died alongside her in a car crash in Paris in 1997.
More than 20 women have spoken to the BBC as part of a special investigation alleging assault and physical violence at properties in London and Paris.
Five women said they had been raped by him, according to the documentary “Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods” due to be broadcast later Thursday and the “World of Secrets” podcast.
Fayed had previously been accused of sexually assaulting and groping multiple women but a 2015 police investigation into a rape allegation did not lead to any charges.
Harrods’ current owners said they were “utterly appalled” by the allegations of abuse, adding: “As a business we failed our employees who were his victims and for this we sincerely apologize.”
In July 2023, Harrods began settling claims with women who came forward with claims of sexual abuse by Fayed from the late 1980s to late 2000s.
Fayed sold the famous store in Knightsbridge in 2010 to the investment arm of Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund for a reported £1.5 billion ($2.2 billion).